实时新闻:

冰河世纪3观后感英语作文参考

发布日期:2022-04-08 02:11:52

如自始至终保护孩子、心地善良的长一毛一象,贪吃的树獭以及开始怀有恶意后来在长一毛一象、树獭及孩子的感化下变得善良的剑齿虎。以下是小编整理的关于冰河世纪观后感,欢迎查阅!

冰河世纪观后感1

It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any puter-animated
film not bearing the Pixar logo。 In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking
success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen。

What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s
Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s,
Inc。's second rate, half wit cousin。

Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long
line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen。 This time,
it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man。

Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot。
But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth
(Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John
Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to
its home。

Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen。

Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc。; or even the
gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered
polygons and Acme animated characters。

No hint of photo-realism here。 It’s like paring a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The
Lion King。

Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going
for。

Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags
and

Leguizamo one liners。 Some of them are even quite funny。 If that is all
that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it。

But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which
fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation。

Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of
displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their
characters。

The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living,
breathing, creatures。 It’s laughable watching their

polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts
at heartfelt, soft touches。

Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably
rendered to slapstick fun levels。 As a result, what slapstick there is, is
highly entertaining。 Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly
spectacular。 But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his
mammoth ineptitude without hesitation。

The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost
laughably bad animation。 The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick
side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of
soon-to-be-extinct

melon-hoarding dodos。 Ice Age’s edy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re
under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else。

冰河世纪观后感2

"Thefirstclass"isthethemeofthe20:theUnitedStates,byyourside.Rodinoncesaid:"lifeisnotlackofbeauty,butalackofeyestofindbeauty."Indeed,aslongaswecarefullyobserve,beautiful,besideyouallthetime.

In this year, we have sprung up around a lot of epic "beautiful people" :
Zhang Lili best teachers, the most beautiful driver Mr. Wu, etc… The most
beautiful characters and their story makes us feel.

Let us feel the motherland strong, the goodness of life and the most
beautiful person of noble character, and encouraged us to find the beauty
around, trying to explore beauty, create beauty, beauty, harmonious beauty, with
practical action to make our world a better place.

First of all, explore the beautiful teacher is: the first class in our
country's first female astronaut liu Yang told us is full of magic, the beauty
of unimaginable space. Went to the space walk, "she said it's a trip, saw the
smallness of the earth, more understand the earth's great.

I love the earth, love the sunshine here, love the fresh air here, love
here pure water; love living here of man…" Listen to the teacher liu told me
exclamation this really want to cry "beautiful".

The second class to create the beautiful teacher is Olympic swimmer jiao
liuywang and poetry. "Dream is the power, for the sake of this dream jiao
liuywang swimming for 15 years. Success is the need to hard and persistence,
persistence to achieve your dream, insist to be successful."

The third lesson for us to pass the beautiful teacher is: Olympic champion
Xu Lijia. She said: "the team spirit of mutual aid, the help of players is I
want to pass out." Like yu Dan teacher speak of "fusion of tea into the boiling
water, tea become beautiful plump in boiling water, but also pass the beauty of
their water supply.

Beauty is no the cent of size, from the first day of school, from the first
class of school, from now on, take the beauty pass out…

The fourth lesson is the Olympic champion, men's gymnastics team captain
Chen yibing showed to us in the previous section harmonious beauty.

He said: "a team have one person made a mistake, we should encourage him,
and his communication to help him decompression, but don't blame him.

With a high-five, hug, convey the positive energy to each other, encourage
each other. No one is perfect, has a perfect team."

By tonight to watch "the first class" the exploration of beauty, create
beauty, beauty, harmonious beauty let me know how the "beauty" outstanding, are
also common.

We're going to use eyes to see the world of beauty, beauty is actually on
my side. The story of life is full of beauty, cleaning workers dedicated beauty;
Of the beauty of harmony between people and animals; Have the love of beauty to
help others;

The beauty of there is the dream of flying in space; Have the beauty of the
disabled an unyielding struggle and enterprising; The natural beauty of
nature;

The beauty of the moon and the sky of the dream; Have the beauty of the
sons and daughters of filial piety to parents… Beautiful, always by my side,
Beauty is everywhere.

冰河世纪观后感3

UP, Pixar's latest animated feature, is just delightful. But how do you go
about extolling the movie's virtues without giving away its surprises? Like the
kid at the beginning of the movie, you don't try to conquer the immovable force;
you work around it.

The one clue I can give away – because it's the movie's heavily hyped
premise – is that Carl Fredrickson, a gruffy old widower (voiced with gruffy old
charm by Ed Asner), miraculously inflates enough balloons to use his house as an
aircraft. Soon, he finds himself reluctantly sharing his ride with a
short-attention-spanned kid named Russell.

I'll also mention a couple of other items that can gauge your potential
interest in the movie. One is a gag that is a take-off on a famous painting –
perhaps too inside of an inside joke, but typical of Pixar's cheery attempts to
appeal to viewers of all ages.

Also, part of the plot involves Carl's long-held wish to meet a
Lindbergh-type adventurer named Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer!). This is
another in-joke that's even vaguer than the first one. Cartoon historians know
that Walt Disney started in the cartoon biz by creating Oswald the Rabbit for
producer Charles Mintz, who then greedily stole the rights to Disney's creation.
This gives you a pretty good idea where the ostensible hero Muntz stands in the
scheme of things.

Beyond that, I can only offer you some enticing clues about the characters.
There's a dog who's the leader of his pack and in menacing beyond measure, until
he opens his mouth and gets one of the movie's biggest laughs. There's a huge,
awkward bird that is a big laugh-getter at first. Then she becomes a real enough
character that – at least in the audience I was in – when she's injured, she
elicits screams of fright worthy of Bambi's late mother.

There's surprising, heartfelt emotion, vivid imagery (you can almost touch
the landscapes and skies), and a music score by Michael Giacchino that's
practically a character in the movie – particularly in a thoughtful montage that
takes Carl from childhood to widowhood.

There aren't many (or at least not enough) live-action movies that are
engrossing as this cartoon. Pixar Studios has gotten to be one of those movie
icons that shouldn't even have to deliver a premise to get funded anymore. The
moneymen should just shut up, hand over the money, and trust they'll get a
product that will appeal to everyone.

UP is only the second Pixar feature to get a PG rating, only for mildly
intense imagery and action – nothing off-color in the least. Again, if you can
handle "Bambi," this film should be a breeze.

冰河世纪观后感4

It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any
computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s
rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is
surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story
heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second
rate, half wit cousin.

Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long
line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time,
it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man.
Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But
when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray
Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo)
must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its
home.

Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen.
Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey,
gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and
Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a
Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what
the folks at Ice Age were going for.

Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and
Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that
we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these
strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst
sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up
to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to
illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than
they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their
polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at
heartfelt, soft touches.

Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably
rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is
highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly
spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his
mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.

The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost
laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick
side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of
soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but
unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.

冰河世纪观后感5

"Ice Age 3" and the inevitable result of success is the assembly line –
Feedback

And compared to Episode II, "Ice Age 3" In the view of somewhat improved,
but the overall quality of this series of films on the downward trend is still
hope that producers stop there, or another bar for new ideas, but the people
will certainly not listen to me, means for misappropriating campaign will be
carried out in full swing. Cast aside the theme of the film itself, the merits
and the plot arrangements, reasonable or not, just from the technical level,
painfully convinced people that make money. It can be said of "Ice Age 3" is
represented by a large number of Hollywood animated film created by the bizarre
color scene of the fairy tale world of "amazing" to describe is not at too much,
but I see "Ice Age 3" the greatest feeling, not only in Here, I am more
impressed by the Hollywood animated film production concepts with strong
technical support of this concept has almost reached Transformation.

As animated films generally have anthropomorphic and fantasy colors, almost
from the creation time, space, role constraints, Earth and even the universe can
be of any species into the animated film, and to speak, human beings can be
carried out in all its activities. From this point of view, extremely broad
drawn animated films, as opposed to live-action film, it is reasonable for its
story demands much more relaxed. But this does not mean that they can be written
and directed nonsense, others do not mess things up, basically you should be
given to the successful stories in, and tell you to read the laugh easily, and
people put money away, bin. "Ice Age 3" It is very intuitive to see that the
Hollywood animated story books written and directed several major magic weapon,
put it plainly, is a production line, according to the routine production,
virtually no run, where the poor are poor not to go.

Magic one: the role of adult sexual

, "Ice Age" series are extremely persistent in pairs of squirrel nuts, as
the film an important clue, which is almost become a sign of this series of
films, "Ice Age 3" is no exception, but also arranged into a female squirrel.
First of all, only on the mother squirrel shape, we see is a mature form of
beauty, male squirrel to see female squirrel that Indecent expression, as well
as the combination of two squirrels and contradictions of having no not
according to adult the evolution of thought and life. This creative approach, in
the Hollywood animated film almost everywhere. Animated films have been the main
audience is children, but precisely because of these "image of the child," which
incorporates elements of the adult's performance, in the form and content of
great contrast given rise to a strong entertainment tastes, and thus film has
become young and old salt Yi had. In contrast to our animated feature films, to
a large extent, are confined to the children's world, not daring to introduce
adult thinking, makes our animation looks very "mental handicap" and is only
suitable for children, adults all day long if staring at "Haier Brothers" Look,
I am afraid we have to be as "mental handicap" had. Of course, this situation
has improved in recent years, but still can not relax hands and feet.

Magic 2: the broad themes

Hollywood's gang marching were that, with unrestrained imagination, almost
all worldly things into their creation among small, "Horton and Anonymous" in
the micro-organisms, large "ice age" in the dinosaur mammoth Like, from the "In
Search of Nimes" in the deep ocean to the "WALL-E" in the vastness of the
universe, from the "Madagascar" in New York's Central Park to "The Lion King" in
the vast grasslands of Africa, from the Arabic legend "Aladdin" China Story
"Mulan" and so on, can be said that as long as you can think of the area, almost
all were involved in Hollywood animation. As a result, as long as technology
licensing, Hollywood animation on the endless subject matter, while the
technical support is exactly the problem the most is not an issue. It is this
breadth of subject matter to create on the guarantee of the Hollywood animated
film is forever full of magic, you can not think of the story will always occur,
and these topics sufficient to accommodate the breadth of global culture, this
let's get the soft admire American culture The underlying strength and strong
technical support. And our domestic animated film is always escape from the
traditional subject matter, a "row sky" for decades, has always been an
insurmountable peak, it is not glory, but rather sad. Some people will say that
our animation technology, immature, this is true, then we are not in the 3D
field advantage in the plane animation technology should not be a problem,
right? Japan's a lot of good animated films are flat, showing that the content
is always greater than the form. "Gray Wolf and the radiant" seems to tell us a
ray of hope, I hope this is not a flash in the pan.

Magic 3: Content of entertaining

Of course, Hollywood's biggest selling point is its animated entertainment.
Take the "Ice Age 3" in the sloth Sid, this is a slick, both ways, but there is
a kind-hearted soul Ichii little bully image, he almost is "Ice Age" series, the
heart and soul is this series the largest entertainment spots. He has all the
weaknesses of ordinary human beings, but it is ordinary human beings with basic
human nature, it is this grass-roots nature of the film as a whole to ensure the
PFP, which is why people find fault no matter how to film, you had to laugh
after reading the smile, you smile, the money did not, and that even if the film
a success. Interestingly, almost all of the animated Hollywood film has one or
two similar to the role of Sid, such as "Shrek" series in the ass, "Mulan" in
the series of wood to be long, "The Lion King" series of gorillas and Later, it
emerged that the two clown – Ding Man and Peng Peng, the emergence of these
roles greatly enhanced the film's fun colors, and some have even become masters,
to be perceived as extremely impressed with the "hero." This would be good
thanks to Hollywood animation producers the ability to manufacture and
trafficking in entertainment, and this ability is almost industrialization,
forming a production line. The role of the basic routines have been identified,
as long as the role of the creation of a walk according to this routine, basic
to success. As long as amused everyone can you say? You do not see is a Lehe
do?

 

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

端午节句子、情侣、下雨天心情、史记读后感、抖音句子、春分时节、冬至、元旦祝福、朋友圈句子、结婚、个人、儒林外史读后感、感想、